Privacy Policy

"We protect your information like a mother hen. We will never rent or sell your email address. You can opt-out at any time."

Systemic Proteolytic Enzymes For Fighting Cancer

systemic-proteolytic-enzymes-for-fighting-cancer_300Systemic proteolytic enzymes have been used successfully for many different illnesses as I explained previously. When it comes to cancer treatment, the history gets a bit scandalous — and very interesting. But you should know how systemic enzyme therapy works to reduce cancer growth, the key people and historical facts behind the story and where things stand today.

Dr. James Beard

In 1902, James Beard, a well-known Scottish Ph.D. embryologist, observed that animal placental embryonic cells (today we call them stem cells) invade the female uterus in many ways like cancer’s invasion of body tissues. Cancer cells are essentially trophoblastic cells (embryonic cells) that can occur in any organ tissue, and, like placental trophoblastic cells, grow very rapidly, migrate, invade other tissues, and form a blood supply of their own. The main difference is that the placenta knows when to stop growing and invading, but cancer does not.

Dr. Beard found that the placenta stops invasive cell growth when the embryonic pancreas starts secreting pancreatic enzymes. From this observation, he determined that pancreatic enzymes control and kill cancer.

In 1906 he used animal pancreatic enzymes to successfully treat cancer in animals and humans. But his work was not published in mainstream medical literature.

William Donald Kelley, D.D.S., M.S. (1925 – 2005)

Dr. Kelley was a practicing dentist who was diagnosed with metastatic pancreatic cancer and successfully survived using the dietary teachings of Max Gerson, M.D., and Dr. Beard’s pancreatic enzyme therapy protocol. Pancreatic cancer is known to have less than a 3 percent survival rate today.

In 1969, Dr. Kelley published an account of his own personal battle with pancreatic cancer and a theoretical explanation of why his protocol worked. Entitled One Answer to Cancer, his book became a best-seller in the “underground” natural medicine market.

Dr. Kelley used his diet modification/proteolytic enzyme protocol and reported a 93 percent success rate for cancer patients who came to him first (before having chemo, radiation, or surgery), and a 50 percent chance of survival for end-stage cancer patients given 3 months to live.

He, as you might expect, was aggressively persecuted for his successes by the medical establishment.

In 1976 the Texas Dental Board suspended his license for 5 years as a result of the “non-dental” cancer therapies he provided. He moved his practice to Tijuana, Mexico and eventually, along with his fellow practitioners, treated approximately 33,000 patients.

In the U.S., Dr. Kelley’s work was suppressed and he was forbidden to advise cancer victims. He tells his own story of cancer and recovery here.

Unfortunately, his story is quite similar to many others who successfully treat cancer in the U.S. (like Dr. Raymond Rife and Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski).

Dr. Kelley wrote: “In our time, there will never be a cure for heart disease or for cancer because there’s just too much money in it for the elite. Between the AMA, the hospitals, pharmaceutical and drug manufacturers, the money wheel never stops turning  — and those who suffer needlessly are bankrupted.”

Nicholas Gonzalez, M.D.

Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez is currently a practicing physician in New York. When he was only a third year medical student he personally met with Dr. Kelley, was allowed to completely review his clinic records, and wrote a detailed summary of Dr. Kelley’s almost unbelievable successes with cancer treatment. You can read this fascinating 2009 recount of the entire story and the scandalous actions of the OTA (office of Technology Assessment) here.

Most notably, Dr. Gonzalez writes:

“The pancreatic part of my investigation proved to be most revealing. I eventually identified 22 patients with the diagnosis who had consulted Kelley between 1974 and 1982. I had been able to document that ten of the patients, all deceased, had not followed the program for a single day. This group, we agreed, could serve as an informal ‘control.’ A second group of seven patients, also all deceased, complied only partially and for limited time periods ranging from four weeks to 13 months, before abandoning the therapy. The mean and median survival for this group ran 302 days, certainly far longer than would be expected. Five patients, all alive when I completed my research, had complied fully. The median and mean survival for this group exceeded eight years, certainly a remarkable statistic in view of the deadly nature of pancreatic cancer, with an average life expectancy reported in the range of 3 to 6 months.”

Cancer Therapy

Dr. Gonzalez, along with Dr. Linda Isaacs, has been in practice in New York since 1987, offering personalized therapy for cancer and other degenerative diseases. Their treatment program is found here. The supplements they recommend (but do not manufacture or sell) include many nutrients, animal glandulars, and “a specially manufactured pancreas product (containing naturally occurring enzymes) made from pig pancreas.” Their cancer patients take up to 45 grams of pancreas product, which is around 130-175 capsules a day.

Today various alternative medicine clinics also use the Kelley protocol. For a list and description of these, go here.

It’s interesting to see that our government’s NCI (National Cancer Institute) currently has their view of Dr. Gonzalez posted on their website.

They detail the failure of his protocol to be effective based on their seven year clinical study, beginning in 1998, of patients with early, middle and advanced stages of pancreatic cancer who were not candidates for surgical removal of the cancer. They reported their results in a 2010 Journal of Oncology. If you will simply read a little further you’ll discover the fiasco of study errors (intentionally botched to prove Gonazalez wrong) their researchers made, which was clearly explained and reported by Dr. Gonzalez. You can see his rebuttal here.

What I find interesting is that proteolytic enzyme therapy has already been shown in the medical literature to have potent anticancer effects. In a 1990 Journal of Experimental Pathology[i], researchers used every other day enzyme therapy on mice with tumors for six months and found it “…showed suppression of growth, and necrosis (and in some cases encapsulation)” and that in the higher concentrations, “…cellular necrosis occurred within three days …” This sheds further light on the real motives of cancer science in America.

[i] Belzer CA, Cavon JF. Effects of proteolytic enzymes on mammary tumor growth: in vitro and in vivo suppression and cellular death of tumor cells. J Exp Pathol. 1990;5(3):97-110.


To feeling good for life,
Michael Cutler, M.D.
Easy Health Options

Filed Under: Alternative MedicineCancerCancer ConcernsEasy Health Digest™

About the Author: Dr. Michael Cutler is a graduate of Brigham Young University, Tulane Medical School and Natividad Medical Center Family Practice Residency in Salinas, Calif. Dr. Cutler is a board-certified family physician with more than 19 years experience. He serves as a medical liaison to alternative and traditional practicing physicians. His practice focuses on an integrative solution to health problems. Dr. Cutler is a sought-after speaker and lecturer on experiencing optimum health through natural medicines and founder and editor of Easy Health Options™ newsletter — a leading health advisory service on natural healing therapies and nutrients.

Facebook Conversations

  • rwheeler

    Thanks for covering cancer therapies, Dr. Cutler. There is so much to be learned from alternative medicine and proteolytic enzyme therapy for cancer. Cleansing, detoxifying, boosting the immune system, proteolytic enzymes, mind-body therapies, possibly IPT and nutritional approaches are the answer to cancer. It shocks me that modern medicine does not accept Otto Warbug’s nobel-prize winning work on low cellular oxygen and cancer’s ability to switch to the fermentation of sugar. Orthodox doctors still allow their patients to eat sugar in every form and this is contrary to the proven science of the metabolics of cancer. No wonder why their success rate is so poor. The answer to cancer is also the key to other chronic debilitating diseases.

  • http://www, Catherine J Frompovich

    Excellent! and thank you, Dr. Cutler, for letting readers know about Dr. Nick Gonzalez, who has great success in treating cancer patients. The only problem with it, from what I understand, is that the Gonzalez protocol is not based in radiation and chemotherapy, which oncology claims cures cancers. Maybe those modalities can cure some, but what about secondary cancers occurring after treatment?
    Since there are numerous choices in all segments of life, business, and industry, why do cancer patients who do not choose the ‘cut, poison, and burn’ protocol have to be discriminated against by not having more humane protocols approved by the CDC and FDA and, therefore, reimbursed by insurance companies. It’s all a matter of following the money trail, which leads back to protecting and securing vested medical interests’ monopoly over healthcare modalities and their influential lobbying tactics in Washington, DC.
    Rather interesting is the fact that in a survey of oncologists, MOST said they would not take the chemotherapy they give their cancer patients. Why, and what do they know that they are not sharing with us?
    Personally, I applaud the holistic methods for dealing with cancer. I have ungrown two cancerous tumors in my right breast using only holistic modalities–no surgery, no chemo, no radiation. I wrote a book while on that ‘odyssey’. The book is A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments available on
    The “War on Cancer” can be won, if only those who keep supplying the ammunition would get out of the way, I think.
    Catherine J Frompovich
    Consumer Health Researcher / Author / Journalist

  • Lynda

    Thank you Dr Culter ,I have a friend who has stage 4 liver cancer and her Drs. don’t really know what to do and how to treat it .Any advice will be greatly appreacited.I saw where a certain kind of mushroom helped liver cancer helped where can this mushroom be found?She is a very nice and kind lady that truly belive and trust in God,there has got to be someone that can help her.Her bill are steady adding up and she can’t get disabilty or anything.Please any advice will be helpful.May God Bless each and everyone of you.

  • Chris Woollams

    DrJames Beard was from Manchester, England but was working in Edinburgh, Scotland as an embryologist in 1906 when he made his observations about stem cells being ‘locked’ as rapidly dividing stem cells under the effects of oestrogen, but being able to differentiate into normal healthy cells by pancreatic enzymes. He described cancer as being ‘like having a baby growing in the wrong place at the wrong time’. He published a book on this in 1911. This was more than 90 years before Wang and his team at British Columbia, observing the same phenomenon as the driving force in stomach cancer, decided they had made a major breakthrough in how cancer develops and claimed that from now on all cancer text books would have to be rewritten. In 2012 cancer stem cells were isolated from the centre of tumours by scientists in London. There is no drug available that kills cancer stem cells which is why tumours tend to be reduced by drugs but grow back.

    Dr Young at the NCI conducted research in August 2012 showing thatbad foods caused the regrowth, and good foods containing certain natural compounds like curcumin, piperine, theanine, choline, EGCG, vitamins E and A, genistein and sulphurophides could stop the regrowth. She stated that all could be taken assupplements.
    Chris Woollams, CANCERactive